- Posts by Courtney McFateMember of the Firm
Attorney Courtney McFate offers employers timely, insightful, and strategic legal advice on a wide range of employment litigation and compliance matters.
Employers of all sizes turn to Courtney to represent them in ...
In a surprisingly employer-friendly decision, the California Court of Appeal recently held that voluntary, prospective written meal waivers for shorter shifts, i.e., those that are more than five but no more than six hours in total, are valid and enforceable. In Bradsbery v. Vicar Operating, Inc., the Court of Appeal held that revocable, prospective meal waivers for shorter shifts are enforceable in the absence of any evidence the waivers are unconscionable or unduly coercive.
Case Background
Plaintiffs, former veterinary assistants and technicians, filed a putative class action in July 2014 against their former employer, Vicar Operating. Plaintiffs alleged in part that Vicar Operating had violated Labor Code section 512(a) by requiring Plaintiffs and putative class members to work shifts between five and six hours without a meal period and without waiving their right to a meal period by mutual consent. Plaintiffs argued that as a result, Vicar owed Plaintiffs and the putative class members premiums for missed meal periods.
Blog Editors
Recent Updates
- California Court of Appeal Holds That Prospective Meal Waivers for Shifts Between Five and Six Hours are Enforceable
- New Jersey Supreme Court Confirms: Commissions Are Wages Under the New Jersey Wage Payment Law
- Insider Strategies for Wage and Hour Compliance Success: One-on-One with Paul DeCamp
- New Paycheck Requirements Coming to Ohio in April
- Time Is Money: A Quick Wage-Hour Tip on … California Wage Statements