On April 28, 2023, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit reversed and remanded a decision from the Western District of Texas declining to issue a preliminary injunction barring the Department of Labor (“DOL”) from enforcing a regulation known as the “80/20/30 rule.”

As we previously reported, on October 29, 2021, the DOL issued a final rule for determining which tipped employees may receive “tip credit” in lieu of receiving the full minimum wage directly from the employer.  Under the 80/20/30 rule, employers must pay employees at least the minimum wage if they spend more than 20% of their time on tasks that do not immediately and directly generate tips, including wiping down tables, filling salt and pepper shakers, rolling silverware into napkins, and other duties referred to in the industry as “side work,” or if they spend more than 30 consecutive minutes performing such tasks.  The Restaurant Law Center and the Texas Restaurant Association promptly sought a preliminary injunction in the Western District of Texas.

Despite assuming that the plaintiffs are likely to succeed on the merits, the District Court denied the preliminary injunction after finding that the plaintiffs had failed to demonstrate that they would be irreparably harmed by the costs they would incur as a result of complying with the new rule.  Among other things, the court noted that employers had already assumed those costs because the rule had been in place for a month before the court conducted its hearing on the request for an injunction.

On appeal, in Restaurant Law Center v. U.S. Department of Labor, No 22-50145 (5th Cir., Apr. 28, 2023), a panel of the Fifth Circuit ordered the District Court to reconsider the preliminary injunction ruling “expeditiously” after concluding that the District Court erred in its analysis of the irreparable harm prong of the preliminary injunction test. The panel’s majority pointed to the District Court’s failure to acknowledge circuit precedent establishing that “the nonrecoverable costs of complying with a putatively invalid regulation typically constitute irreparable harm [,]” as well as the DOL’s concession that businesses will incur ongoing costs to comply with the rule, as grounds for reversal.

In addition to requiring reconsideration of the question of irreparable harm, the Fifth Circuit also ordered the District Court to consider the remaining prongs of the preliminary injunction test that were not previously analyzed, including whether the threatened injury outweighs any harm that will result to the non-movant if the injunction is granted, and whether the injunction will disserve the public interest. (Note: Epstein Becker & Green represents the Restaurant Law Center and the Texas Restaurant Association in this matter.)

Back to Wage and Hour Defense Blog Blog

Search This Blog

Blog Editors


Related Services



Jump to Page


Sign up to receive an email notification when new Wage and Hour Defense Blog posts are published:

Privacy Preference Center

When you visit any website, it may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. This information might be about you, your preferences or your device and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to. The information does not usually directly identify you, but it can give you a more personalized web experience. Because we respect your right to privacy, you can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings. However, blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable information.

Performance Cookies

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance.